Time To Go Tom!

BECOME A FAN OF FIRE TOM IRWIN ON FACEBOOK

fblogo

 

Dec 28: Looting Matanuska Maid As The Lioness Sleeps.

NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed

With the governor apparently pre-occupied with being lionized as a government watchdog and ethics reformer extraodinaire, it appears the public assets of Mataunuska Maid are being systematically looted by her Creamery Board and Valley milk farmers.

 

In a recent deluge of emails from agriculture industry insiders, it’s become clear that Valley milk producers involved in starting up the new South Central Dairy Co-Op, are being allowed to pillage the remaining state assets in the now vacant Matanuska Maid Plant in Anchorage.
    
It is no coincidence that immediately following Senator Lyda Green's November 2, 2007 request for a Legislative Audit on Mat Maid, DNR requested a check be drawn for the full amount of the $600,000 public funds to be paid directly to Mat Maid. 

The funds were paid out in full November 8, 2007. 

This is completely contrary to DNR's initial instructions specifically given to this board that the State would not just be cutting a blank check to Mat Maid and that the Board had to provide specific details with supporting documentation to justify all disbursements. 

No one seems willing to verify what has been done with the funds.  But then after what we’ve seen the last six months, who could you ask and hope to get an honest answer?

The State Agricultural Revolving Loan Fund (ARLF) has charged off approximately $12,000,000 in dairy loans in the past 19 years.  This averages over $631,000 annually in loss of public funds.  This does not represent all Federal, State and Borough public funds that have been lost in the Alaska dairy industry.

Contrary to popular belief, Matanuska Maids expenses are not stopping due to the shut down of the dairy. Costs such as taxes, insurance, maintenance, staffing, tax returns & financial statements, pending litigation, outstanding accounts payables to vendors and asset disposal costs haven’t even been addressed.

The Agriculture Revolving Loan Fund will be on the hook which puts the entire agriculture industry at risk. The Creamery Board is on track to fritter away all of the ARLF assets to support 4 local dairy producers. 

Since Governor Palin allowed the Board of Agriculture and the Creamery Board to be run by the same conflicted interests, there is no oversight to protect and manage the ARLF for the benefit of all the Alaskan agricultural industry.

Questions are being raised by agriculture industry insiders:

Are the owners of the new South-central Dairy Co-Op illegally swapping out equipment now that Matanuska Maid is shut down and the dairy is empty?

Is the Creamery Board allowing the most valuable pieces of equipment to be acquired for next to nothing by the new dairy co-op when many say the equipment could bring as much as $250,000 at auction? If this is allowed to happen, the new board would be devaluing Mat Maid as an asset.

How will Matanuska Maid’s creditors be paid? Accounts payables are over a million dollars and that doesn’t include the pending lawsuits by former executives who were denied their pensions.
 
Why were there consultants from Seattle at the Matanuska Maid dairy plant in Anchorage  measuring the press, the gallon filler and the homogenizer? Is the Creamery Board allowing the new co-op to acquire this equipment without first seeing if it can be auctioned off?

How much of their own private cash are these new farmers putting into their new dairy venture? They have received a $650,000 grant from the federal government and are now looking for an additional $200,000 from the legislature to help Valley farmers get by until the new venture is open this spring. Where is their skin in the game?

Also, who granted permission to have Mat Maid employees work on packaging for the new dairy co-op on Mat Maid time? Although Mat Maid didn’t receive a dime in state subsidies over the last twenty years, this new dairy co-op is using the state like an ATM machine.
  
Is anybody paying attention to the fact that in their federal grant proposal they call for paying local farmers $28/cwt, the same as Matanuska Maid was paying? Now the co-op organizers say they don't know how much they'll be able to pay local farmers.  

Why isn’t Governor Palin ensuring Matanuska Maid’s assets are being used to satisfy creditors? Where in the world is Alaska's ethical political king of the jungle?

As the song says, “the lion sleeps tonight”.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Mat Maid

.It appesrs to me that it msy be time for an independent investigation (Special Prosecutor) into the actions of DNR, The Agriculture Board, Creamery Board and anyone else involved. Love your blog keep up the good work.


Contacting the creamery board?

Andrew, is there any way to get in touch directly with the creamery board members to express dissatisfaction with the handling (or mangling) of Mat Maid? Would it do any good at this point? What do you think should happen next? Why didn't they go organic years ago? My husband and I talked about that several years ago when I began buying organic milk exclusively. They could have cornered the market. How many more "Friends of Palin" do we have to tolerate before someone wakes up and realizes we're living in a giant sorority party? I'm almost afraid to ask but does anyone in her administration have any business sense?.

Andrew's Response:

The only email address I could find is through the Director of Agriculture's Office.

Franci.Havemeister@alaska.gov

Here is the current Board:

Kristan C. Cole6/18/2007 09/01/2009
General Business/Financial Experience
5131 East Mayflower Lane
Wasilla, AK 99654
Raymond DePriest6/18/2007 9/01/2009
Commercial Agriculture Production Rep. (Hay)
HC Box 9731
Palmer, AK 99645-9509
VACANT   
Commercial Agriculture Production Rep.
 
 
John Schirack6/18/2007 9/01/2008
Soil/Water Conservation & Commercial Agriculture Rep.
1335 E. Carney Rd.
Wasilla, AK 99654
Ben VanderWeele6/18/2007 9/01/2008
Commericial Agriculture Production Rep. (Produce)
P.O. Box 461
Palmer, AK 99645-0461


CBC

This sounds like the Corrupt Dairy Club.


Mat Maid Dairy

I agree with your concerns about what is happening with the Dairy as it shuts down, but what puzzles me is why was the dairy allowed to survive as long as it did? There was a legislative audit done during the Knowles administration that recommended closure of the dairy at that time. That recommendation was obviously ignored by several administrations. When it was finally decided to shutter Mat Maid, why didn't the board separate the bottled water and plastics division from the dairy division? We hear all this comment about how the dairy division was losing buckets of money but how was the bottled water side doing? How was the plastics division doing? There would have been more than one serious bidder for those two divisions if they had been separated out. I for one would have been interested. Year to date we have purchased $60,000.00 worth of bottles and caps from them to package our own distilled water. There are other vendors out there that had Mat Maid package and bottle water for them as well and probably did substantially more volume than I. When my current supply of bottles disappears, I will be left high and dry, unless I significantly increase the price of my product since shipping empty gallon jugs from America is ridiculously expensive. Consequently, it isn't only the dairy industry that is being impacted by this bungled dissolution of Mat Maid. The bottled water industry is taking a major hit as well but no one hears anything about that. I'm fortunate in that I am diversified enough to weather this storm but there are others out there that the closure of the plastics/bottled water side of Mat Maid will have a significant impact on their business.

Andrew's Response:

Steve brings up a brilliant question; why wasn't there any thought given to the impacts to customers beyond the milk side of the dairy business?

I believe the actions of the new Creamery Board give us the answer.

They were only focused on helping the Valley milk farmers. It could be seen in their first official board action, which was to vote to pay more money for local milk at a time the dairy was already upside down.

Throughout the whole disposal process, no thought was given to anything other than how they could keep propping up local milk producers.

Steve is right about the water side of the business making money. In fact, at the time the previous board voted to shut the dairy down the water business was the only thing adding positive cash flow to Mat Maid.

If the new Creamery Board would have taken a balanced approach, they would have looked at salvaging the water and bottling side of the business.

However, the initial applicants for the $650,000 federal grant that is funding the new dairy co-op start up, were in competition with Mat Maid's water business and had their own small water bottling plant.

They recognized the water/bottling business was profitable and wanted to get their hands on Mat Maid's. This was not a secret.

In the end, the deal fell through and the Creamery Board became focused only on the plight of local milk producers.    


Water?

How on earth did the State of Alaska get into the water sales business? Why not the car rental business, or how about Mat Maid Mart? Maybe those ventures could add more cash flow to a failed business model of Mat Maid Dairy? Lets bring back the old Creamery Board and Ag Board to show us how? I hear there are a few Executive that could use work. I think not.


Mat Maid bottling water

Matanuska Maid has equipment to make plastic containers for milk that can also make containers for bottling water. It was a natural to bottle water to utilize both the equipment and the work force which subsequently subsidized the milk. This was a sound business decision made by the past Corporate Boards and Management and not by politicians.


Mr. Halcro, what about the

Mr. Halcro, what about the business plan that was talked about during the Murkowski term? I understand the business plan was never completed. Also, the issue of calling the police on the looting of Mat Maid equipment was brought up in the ADN blog. I have to agree with the blogger who mentioned such. Do you think the police should be called if equipment is being taken without permission? Wouldn't that be appropriate?

Andrew's Response:

I'm not sure what you mean by business plan. If you're referring to the plan for Mat Maid, the Ad Hoc committee in 2006 pretty much predicted what would happen given all economic factors and said the only way out would be to sell it lock, stock and milk crate.

The comings and goings at Mat Maid are being allowed by the Creamery Board and so far as they're concerned it's perfectly legal. However since there is no longer a system of checks and balances in place because the same members of the Creamery Board also run the Agriculture Board, they could give these state assets away at a garage sale and claim they have the authority to do so.

One of the first complaints when Governor Palin fired the previous Ag Board and the Creamery Board, was that by allowing them to be run by the same people, she was violating the corporate structure established when the state assumed management of Mat Maid in the 80's. 

The reason for the two different and separate boards was to isolate Mat Maid from political agendas and to provide a clear check and balance to ensure the dairy was run on sound business principles instead of cronyism.

The police can't stop what is happening at Mat Maid, only the governor can. Don't hold your breath because the current crop of folks running Mat Maid into the ground are the same folks the governor handpicked back in June.


Did you call the police over the taking of MM equipment?

And during the Murkowski administration a business plan was discussed. Do you have facts on such?

Andrew's Response:

The Dairy Ad-Hoc Committee has their report posted on the Division of Agriculture web page. It's a telling read, especially when you consider that this information was all available before the governor  made the decision to keep the dairy open.

http://www.dnr.state.ak.us/ag/ag_adhoc.htm


NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed


copyright 2007 Andrew Halcro, All Rights Reserved.