I'm a fan...

ll2

phil

 

Don't Slap the Hands that Hold Our Future

NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed

 

With every syllable the halls of Lake Otis Elementary School seemed to close in around my nine year-old psyche. 

“Of all the kids in this school I expected better from you Andrew”, the teacher said sternly.

But this wasn’t just any teacher; it was Mr. Caputo, my idol. His disappointment was justified.

Earlier that morning I had made a poor decision at recess. Before either one of us could get dusty, we got carried away. The recess monitor had lifted us both two feet off the ground and to the principal’s office. The recess monitor was Mr. Caputo. His subsequent hallway lecture had lasting impacts.

Today, teachers like John and Jennifer Schmitz help spell the Lou Caputo’s of my generation. He teaches at Bartlett High while she teaches at Trailside Elementary, both are homegrown Anchorage School District graduates. He chose teaching to be a role model and to make a difference. She followed a family tree of educators recognizing teaching was a special calling.

Suffice to say, John and Jennifer are representative of the magnificent people we entrust with our children on a daily basis.

To put the importance of teachers in perspective, recent studies reveal the average parent spends fifteen minutes a day in conversation with their kids. Contrast that with the six hours a day your child spends in school. By the time students reach age 18, they’ve spent 13% of their life in the classroom.

But today, when a teacher’s role is more critical than ever, they’re being devalued at an alarming pace.

From politicians who recently threw teacher retirement security overboard, to critics that falsely claim teachers are under worked and overpaid (many teachers must take second jobs during the summer). We’re quickly losing site of just how important teachers are to the future of Alaska.

Today the average teacher graduates college with 85% more student loan debt than just a decade ago. Meanwhile, wages for educators haven’t kept pace with inflation. In 1993 Alaska ranked 2nd in the nation in teacher average salary. In 2003 Alaska’s teachers ranked 13th. At the same time the job of teaching our children is becoming more difficult.

Fewer parents participate in their child’s education while demanding teachers perform miracles. More students are coming to school unprepared to learn; more serious social problems are surfacing including threats of violence. A more diverse classroom with increasing demands such as increased numbers of special needs students as well as 95 different first languages.

And if all of these pressures aren’t enough, Governor Murkowski is about to add more.

Retirement security for the private sector is based on a three-legged stool theory: Personal savings, some employer-based 401k or pension and social security (which is a defined benefit plan). But unlike the private sector, public employees in Alaska aren’t eligible for social security, which means retirement security rests solely in their defined benefit plan.

However Governor Murkowski is preparing to sign a pension overhaul that will eliminate defined benefit plans and replace it with a defined contribution plan –read 401k. That means Teachers, Policemen, Firemen and every other public employee hired after next July will have retirement benefits based exclusively on their own investment savvy and the vagaries of the stock market.

You remember the vagaries of the stock market don’t you? In 2000, your PFD was $1,963; four years later it dropped to $919. In fact, market uncertainty is why 64% of Americans oppose the idea of private accounts for social security. In “Coming Up Short: The Challenge of 401(k) Plans”, authors Alicia Munnell and Annika Sunden research the retirement economics of defined contribution plans. The bottom line is that 401 (k) plans fail to provide retirement security by themselves.

But that shouldn’t be news to the governor. The legislatures own independent expert testified, “In general defined contributions is not a reliable vehicle for a secure retirement”. So did they look at viable and suggested alternatives like blended or hybrid options? No.

This legislation was nothing more than get even politics (the two Democrats who voted for the bill got $100 million in capital projects). But this time they got even with the wrong people. The people Alaska needs to grow more of in the next decade.

Please forgive them Mr. Caputo, they know not what they do.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Early Education

I have two children in preschool and both have an IEP. My daughter has one for speech and my son who is 3 has one for speech, ot, and pt he has very speific needs and sensor issues and I have to fight for every little thing that he needs to provide him with the same educational learning to get him into kindergarten. The school district gets and certin amount of state money for is IEP to provide him with preschool and any other things he needs such as a privte aide and so forth, Which I have to fight for and am in the process of because my son is getting LEFT BEHIND by the school district not his private preschool which is wonderful. So my question is what are you going to do about early childhood education if elected? Also about education in rual areas of Alaska? It is great that you and the other running mates want a natural gas line but if you don't educate the children who is going to work and run the pipeline?


Privatize Education

You spoke of accountability in an economic developement article. There is very little accountability in the public education system. Privatize education, sit back and watch how the quality skyrockets. Don't like a school? Move your kid to a school you like. Want them tought creationism? Put them in a Christian school. Want them taught evolution? Put them in a school that emphasizes science theory. Kid's athletic? Put them in a sports oriented school. Want an all around school that has a little of everything? The market will provide. A private school is run as a business. If the consumer wants it, they'll provide it. If students and parents don't like a teacher, they'll be replaced. Unfortunately, as the system is now, people without kids are paying exorbant amounts of money for kids in their town to go to substandard schools and get a substandard education. People with kids are paying the same amount for a substandard education. Doesn't sound fair to me. Thanks for your time, Daniel Rauchenstein Anchorage


$100 Million in School Projects

The bulk of the capital that Rep. Kapsner recieved last year was to help patch together school houses that are barely habitable. Part of something is usually better than all of nothing, and if that is what she needed to do on behalf of her kids, then I do not begrudge her. To imply that Democrats had anything to do with the conversion to defined contribution retirement is flat false.


Andrew's Reply

 

The record shows that Rep. Kapsner originally opposed SB141 when it was initially defeated in the House during regular session.

It wasn't until special session when the Senate started buying votes by rolling $100 million into the Capitol budget. All of the sudden, two House Democrats switched sides and voted for SB141 to allow the bill to pass....by 2 votes.

When one of the biggest challenges rural Alaska has faced for years has been retaining educators, creating a retirement policy that encourages teacher mobility is far from the best interest of her kids or any kid in Alaska's public school system.

  


In Response to "Don't Slap the Hand ... "

Is the sauce for the geese just as good for the ganders? Are they overhauling all public employee retirment systems which would include themselves or just the public servants in the actual trenches? The legislators in the ivory towers in Juneau (they should be here, more accessible) forget that they too put on their pants or pantyhose one leg at a time and are made of the mortal flesh of which we are made. I am willing to "bite the bullet" and conserve when it serves the common good, but to be made the whipping boy for the sins of the legislators' overspending is impossible and horribly rude. My response will be to recommend that new teachers find a state with a more sane and teacher-friendly policy. I spend hundreds of dollars of my own money each year for classroom supplies and incidentals for my students. I spend many many hours of out of school hours correcting papers, planning for lessons, and worrying about my students. One night at about 10:00 a mother called saying her son had not come home. I was as worried as she was. I called my fellow teachers and we reached out to each other and the neighborhood until we found the child (he had forgotten to tell his mother he was having pizza and a movie at a friend's house). I would not have slept until he was safe at home because I invest my heart and soul into my work. I am not alone. Each teacher I meet is similarly committed to their students. To be treated like we are trying to cheat the system or ask for more than fair compensation is insulting. If Mr. Murkowski were in my 6th grade class, I would have a private chat with him about showing more respect for the adults working to better his existence. After all, the future Alaskan policy makers are in my classroom last year, this year, and next year! Fairness is my doctrine. Carol Woods


NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed


copyright 2007 Andrew Halcro, All Rights Reserved.