I'm a fan...

ll2

phil

 

Government emails and credibility

NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed

In Monday morning's Anchorage Daily News, Lisa Demer pens a column about how the Palin administration is using personal email acounts to skirt public records laws and withholding emails that rightly should be available to public records requests.

The governor's chief defender is her press secretary Bill McAllister who following in the Palin mode, is wont to cast the blame on others rather than simply explain how an open and transparent government has become closed and secretive.

"I don't hear any public clamor for access to internal communications of the governor's office," McAllister said.

Wrong Bill. In fact there have been numerous requests for access to internal communications that have so far have been refused for seemingly ridiculous reasons.

In July the administration released a list of 78 pages of emails, totalling over 1100 communications that they deemed as executive privilege and refused to release to the public. Many of these have very curious subject titles such as Dan Fagan, Andrew Halcro or The Ear.  

"I know there are some people out there blogging and talking who would like to embarrass the governor by taking an internal communication and spinning it in some fashion," McAllister added.

Yes Bill, like the internal communication between you and the governor's infamous right hand man, Frank Bailey, where you are shown negotiating for a job when you were still covering the Palin administration as the political reporter for a local television station?

As part of the recent freedom of information act release of emails from Bailey's state computer, it looks as if McAllister could have been in line for a job as far back as the beginning of April.

On Sunday, April 6, Sheila Toomey printed a blurb in her Ear column that stated that McAllister was preparing to leave KTUU.

McAllister immediately posted a note on his NBC blog stating:

"Sheila Toomey -- aka "The Ear" -- left messages for me this afternoon indicating that she is preparing an item, presumably for Sunday's Anchorage Daily News, saying that I have "given notice" at Channel 2.  As I indicated in an e-mail to Sheila afterward, her description of what she was going to write is not strictly accurate. I have not set a date for departure from Channel 2, but there's nothing official yet on the next step."

At 10:44am, McAllister sent an email to Bailey attaching a link to his KTUU blog where McAllister had just posted his blog addressing  Toomey's claim he was leaving. "Just wanted to eliminate any possibility of looking presumptuous", McAllister told Bailey.

Ten minutes later, Bailey responded by telling McAllister "As soon as I read the ear this morning I thought 'dang, hope bill doesn't think I said aything on this!

You brought clarity to people all over the State Bill. You're an awesome communicator", Bailey wrote.

Two days later McAllister sent an email to Bailey saying "Still haven't received anything from you, at either email account. FYI." Bailey responded six minutes later; "Let me know if you finally received that from my personal account (last few words redacted)"

It appears clear that McAllister was negotiating a job with the administration while he was still covering them as a reporter during the legislative session. In fact, McAllister continued to cover the Palin administration for another three months after the email exchange. 

So hey Bill; if us bloggers are spinning what appears to be a questionable breach of journalistic ethics, feel free to tell us how you were not negotiating for a job while you were still covering the administration for KTUU.

 

To read the email exchange between Bill McAllister and Frank Bailey, click attachment below.

 

To read the ADN story on the email:

http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/story/526281.html

See this Article in Print!
Download Article (PDF)

76.85 KB

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Governor isn't the only one

who may be using personal email accounts to avoid scrutiny of back channel state communications. But she may be the only governor, certainly the only VP candidate, using an unsecure free webmail service to do it. Just another example that "good ole folksy know how" will not make for effective leadership in the real world of international politics.


HACKED

Andrew what does it mean for the investigation now that Palin's e:mail acct. was hacked? Also, why was she using private e:mail accounts to conduct state business?Open and transparent, I think not.


America says no to Palin

At last; the webs are buzzing around the world. Palin/Mccain upset at hacking incident, but truthfully the webs, blogs show support for whoever did this. That is because of the entire WH and cronies infringing on American peoples right's to know. I don't like law being broken, but sometimes it looks divinely suspicious and wonderful. While they take our rights away, somebody peeked into their boogy box. Priceless. Andrew, Alaskans...chin up, America is behind you


PALIN!?

Thanks to a GREAT friend THERE in the JUNEAU area...Good by SARAH!! JIM of Machias, MAINE!


Just tacky

"I don't hear any public clamor for access to internal communications of the governor's office," McAllister said. It's because you hear what you want to hear. We were hand fed B.S. before with Murkowski, that's the platform she ran with and ultimately won with...and now it seems that it's the same ol' candy covered garbage coming from the same ol' Administration. Shame on you Bill, shame on you for leaving your back bone at the door. Shame on you for chasing $$$ instead of the truth. Shame on you for trying to spin the truth. I bet it's been so long since you've looked in the mirror you've forgotten what you look like, well let me tell you. You look like a politician's little lap dog. Woof woof Bill McAllister, WOOF WOOF!


It's all over the internet

Hey Andrew. It's 5:57pm and I'm just now checking out the late afternoon news - and discover: Sarah will not cooperate with Branchflower's investigation because it is "tainted." As a conservative, Evangelical, Republican - this level of spin and OUTRIGHT lies by the McCain camp is disgusting to me. I sure hope that the wrath of all who love the truth and due process will rise up like a tsunami in this state (and now the nation) and expose this farce on the McCain side for what it is. I used to respect John McCain for his forthrightness and his frank style. How disgraceful. Country First? Right. Kick due process and the "three equal but separate branches of guvment" schtick to the curb; and what are we supposed to do? Just take it? I hope Republicans will locate their moral compass and demand honesty out of this charade passing itself off on the duped public as an honorable campaign. (Sorry for the rant - I'm just not used to taking so many lies without any shame being shown.) What does this mean? Is it Steve back in front of Charlie, Hollis and Co.? Will we have to airlife Charlie in from his moose hunt so he can vote?


We in the lower 48 who are watching helplessly

...want to know: How can the McCain campaign interfere in a state investigation? By what authority? Why don't Alaskans do something? Recall petition! Class action lawsuit. Something! How did Alaska elect this woman!!! after her sorry performance in Wasilla? Widespread apathy?


Email Confidentiality

Count me as part of the 'clamor' for open government. There is no protection, Sarah, just because you tried to hide your communications in personal accounts. Palin is very talented, a great communicator. But she is an absolute amateur. She needs to learn from her 'rookie mistakes' in order to mature into a politician that is worthy of even a governorship, much less a national level politician. I really believe most people make these kinds of judgement errors early on, in business or in politics. In time, the best leaders understand there are no shortcuts. They rise to the top. Sarah has not done that yet. She was picked not for being ready, but for being convenient to McCain's needs. Not her fault. But she should have said no. Now the voters will say no to her, and thus to McCain, because it was just too soon. The problems mount every day, and soon John is going to look up and say 'what did I do?'. Sarah. Learn to do the right thing when no one is looking, not just under the spotlight. Do the same things you say, and please, please say the things you do. Don't say you welcome an investigation, then stonewall it. Don't say 'thanks but no thanks', when you really meant 'thanks for the money, but no thanks for the bridge'. Keep Todd out of your office, other than ceremonial functions. No one elected him. They elected you. Admit that you were the Queen of earmarks and say you have repented...or better yet that you are going to repent. Don't pretend you haven't fed at the congressional trough. You have increased spending every year that you have been in any office, from what I read. Why say you are a fiscal conservative. Just admit you have been lucky to have increased income every year. That doesn't work in Washington. Luck is not on your side. And you are not ready to take on these extremely difficult issues.


naive

I am not a naive person. Part of me wants to just shake my head and not be surprised at the ethically challenged government. But a larger part of me just wants to cry at the betrayal that this administration has inflicted on Alaskans. Bill McAllister - this is sick - is there no end to the antics of Palin and her subjects? Where is the outcry? I'm hearing it and it is rumbling, soon to be a roar and then a "CRACK" (lightening).


Now McCain adds to the lies about Walt

Can someone explain to me why it is no one has gotten warrants for all of their personal computers, blackberries etc? Whether they deleted these emails or not there is still record of them on the drive. None of them are smart enough to reformat a hard drive to the point where retrieval is impossible. It is known they all used personal accounts and personal devises so get a warrant already. It seems those investigating are finding it easier to just throw up their hands. Also, why in the hell is McCain’s campaign inserting themselves into an issue that involves the state of Alaska? See article below, they say they can prove Walt was fire due to insubordination. That is total BS. Palin herself said it had nothing to do with Monegan’s performance. It was supposedly due to her wanting to take the department in a new direction (one she could never clarify) then later she says it was due to the budget. Now she has Mclame making excuses for why she will not be allowed to be interviewed. There sure is a lot of cover up in this so call transparent government. Today’s article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/26722934#26722934


There's no warrants because

There's no warrants because no judge or prosecutor believes there was a crime here. This is French and the Obama Democrats trying to smear Palin, simple as that.


In July when the

In July when the investigation was begun by a bipartisan committee, nobody could have predicted Palin would be McCain's running mate. Not even Palin or McCain. Are you claiming Obama can foretell the future? If so, would that not be an excellent quality in a president?


He should fit in just fine

Based on the revelations in this blog about Bill McAllister, there is no doubt that he has the right mind set and ethics code to fit into this administration perfectly.


I don't know if anyone can

I don't know if anyone can help me out, but I have some questions: 1. If Palin conducts State e-mail business on her "personal" blackberry, do these emails belong to the State or to Sarah Palin's personal affairs? 2. Does Title 40, Public Records and Recorders, and Chapter 21, Management and Preservation of Public Records, apply to any of the State-business emails that Palin sent and received at her personal account? Do AS 40.21.050. Regulations., AS 40.21.060. Duties of Chief Executive Officers of State Agencies., AS 40.21.070. Records Management For Local Records., and ESPECIALLY AS 40.21.080. Disposal of Public Records By Political Subdivision., apply? AS 40.21.080. says: "An official of a political subdivision of the state having legal custody of public records that are considered by the official to be without legal or administrative value or historical interest may compile lists of these records sufficiently detailed to identify them and submit the lists to the governing body of the political subdivision. The governing body may authorize the disposal and the method of disposal of the records in the list that it finds to be without legal or administrative value or historical interest. The governing body may also, upon request of the legal custodian of the records, authorize in advance the periodic disposal of routine records that the governing body considers to have no legal, administrative, or historical value. After receipt of written authorization from the governing body, the legal custodian of the records may dispose of the records. The legal custodian shall file in the office from which the records were drawn a descriptive list of the records disposed of and a record of the disposal itself. Copies of these documents shall be transmitted to the governing body, which shall file and preserve them." I'm not a lawyer and I don't know if these statutes or others apply to the executive branch, but I'm wondering, if Palin and other executive branch officials channeled state business through their private email accounts, and if they deleted these emails, were they violating state law? I sure doubt Palin went through the process described above if she deleted any state emails from her personal account. I think all State email business, whether sent through State or personal accounts, belong to the State should be archived. There could be legal and other reasons for this. I don't think executive branch officials should unilaterally decide which emails should be saved or deleted. I think either AS 40.21.080. (or something similar) should be employed to make this determination. Otherwise Alaska's government archives are screwed.


curious

Andrew - this is slightly off topic this thread - but I'm curious if you would address where the Troopergate investigation is at - what's the timeline? Is the legislative branch still hopeful of wrapping things up by early October? Exactly what are the possible ramifications of the conclusions of the investigation? I know legally Senator French has said worst case scenario is possible impeachment. But assuming it's not the worst case scenario we're looking at - what are the possible conclusions? A fine? I'm just really curious. Thanks for any light you can shine on this topic.


OMG! TWO E-mail Accounts!

I'm sure you've never mistakenly sent an e-mail from one e-mail account that should have been sent from another. And what if Palin had sent a "Honey, bring home a loaf of bread and a gallon of milk" e-mail to Todd? Calls for impeachment for using a state e-mail account for personal business? She carries two Blackberries to keep personal business and state business separate. Same as I do in private industry. She's open and honest about it. How many e-mail accounts do you use each day? Sometimes they get mixed up, most of the time they don't. Exactly what are you going to do with your life when McCain/Palin are elected? Spend the next four years focusing on that, too, to find every possible nit and report on it? I still marvel that McCain did not pick you . . .

..Fair enough. So release the emails from the government accounts...nothing wrong with that right?


Put down the Kool-Aid

C'mon now, CJ. Show a little intellectual honesty. 1. Sarah Palin ran on an "open and transparent government" platform. 2. She agreed to fully cooperate with the investigation of the firing of Walt Monegan. She and her staff of sycophants have reneged on both counts. There is more but isn't that enough? CJ, please don't expect me to drink the Kool-Aid just because you have. I am not that thirsty.


Oh baloney Open and honest?

Oh puhleeze. Why all the emails from Sarah and lawyers asking if using a personal account could allow her to circumvent emails from being part of public record? She CAMPAIGNED on objections to Frank Murkowski having "closed door" negotiations. Now her Bill McCallister says that the final results of her decisions will be posted, but ignore the discussions leading to those decisions? That's EXACTLY what she objected to in other administrations. Now SHE is the one using subterfuge, secrecy, and the most obtuse methods possible. Her administration offers the weak excuse that she is "within the law" (written before email accounts on personal blackberrys were possible). It would not be so offensive if she had not campaigned on an objection to the very behavior she engages in. She is NOT open and transparent. Or at least not until now-- when she is being "outed" as a politics as usual. I am SO disappointed.


Show us

If you are right, then you should have no problem with Palin revealing not only the e-mails that she sent/received on her state account, but any state business that was conducted on her private account. Unlike what you do in private industry, public documents are subject to inspection by the public, and in an age of supposed "open and transparent" government, the Palin administration should not be concealing their efforts to hide public communications by using a private account. Even their own attorneys say that won't wash.


Two accounts

CJ, I think you're missing the point. I have accidentally mixed up accounts, but I have never intentionally used a secondary account to avoid detection. The few emails she has released make it clear that there was a policy to use the private account to avoid accountability.


Take Note From Eliot Spitzer...

Eliot use to have a saying when he was governor (before he got too horny and lost his job after getting nailed visiting prostitutes): "Never speak when you can nod, never nod when you can wink and never, ever say anything in e-mail."


Integrity: Who has it, who doesn't

Andrew, please look at the current abcnews website. It features an article in which Monegan declares Palin lied in last week's abc interview by claiming she never pressured him to fire Wooten. Evidently integrity is not a virtue possessed by Palin the VP candidate.


Walt

The longer he is out of a job, the better his memory gets. Imagine that. And read this carefully: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=5804703&page=2 *** In a 20/20 interview, Palin told ABC's Charles Gibson she dismissed Monegan for poor job performance and that neither she nor her husband pressured Monegan to fire State Trooper Wooten. "We never did. I never pressured him to hire or fire anybody," Palin said. But Monegan told ABC News.com he was summoned to a meeting with Todd Palin in December 2006, shortly after Sarah Palin became governor. "I was called to her Anchorage formal Governor's office to talk with Todd Palin about an issue that was a private family matter," recounted Monegan. Todd became "upset," Monegan recalled, when told the allegations had already been investigated and the case would not be re-opened. "When Sarah later called to tell me the same thing, I thought to myself, 'I may not be long for this job.'" But, Monegan said, he stood by his position. "I held the public trust. As Chief, I was responsible." *** Todd asked Monegan to reopen the investigation. He didn't ask that Monegan fire Wooten, just that he look again which Monegan refused to do.


As The Stomach Turns

What a double gut punch for my Monday morning. BM negotiating a job with the very group he purported to be observing as an objective journalist. State officials obviously using personal email accounts to hide activities from public scrutiny. I need a dose of "pepto-abysmal", and here it is. Every keystroke, every message or email sent, is discoverable. Even the deleted ones. Even the personal private ones. All is takes is a motivated legislative committee with the power to issue subpeonas, and time. Is it too late to start a write-in campaign for Lyda Green?


Lyda

Count me in- 2 more votes for Lyda in this valley house!!


McAllister

Bill McAllister is the press secretary for the zombie rat gang. I seriously can't even stand to watch him on the news anymore. He's like Eddie Burke to me. It hurts to listen to them both!


NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed


copyright 2007 Andrew Halcro, All Rights Reserved.