Legal Fees: The First Family Defense
NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed

(3/21/09) The latest public disclosure documents show Gov. Sarah Palin owes more than a half million dollars to an Anchorage law firm that has defended her against ethics complaints.
According to the Anchorage Daily News article written by Lisa Demer, legal bills have mounted fighting complaints that Palin has called partisan, false and frivolous, starting with "the politically motivated Troopergate probe."
"On August 29, it seems the political landscape changed in Alaska. Now, it seems in order to do this job as Governor, with the political blood sport some are playing today, only the independently wealthy or those willing to spend their income on legal fees to defend their official actions in office ... can serve," Palin said in the written response to Daily News questions.
The governor has said she may create a legal fund to help defer the cost of these fees.
Okay, before we start passing the hat for legal bills to cover the cost of these unfair witch hunts that have been conducted against Palin, lets take a closer look at two of the complaints.
First: Troopergate.
There were two separate investigations concerning the Troopergate probe, both came to the same facts at the end of the process; Palin's husband was trading on the governor's power in her own administration to settle a personal score.
Both the Branchflower and the Petumenos reports clearly identified Todd Palin had exerted influence in trying to get his former brother in law fired.
The main difference in the reports was that Branchflower concluded the governor had the responsibility to control her husband while Petumenos concluded the governor didn't have any responsibility to control her husband because he was just an average citizen who was exercising his rights.
One of those rights apparently included the right to use his position as the governor's husband to pressure state employees to act on his behalf. As the governor's former legislative liaison said during Troopergate; when the governor's husband suggests you do something, it's not really a suggestion.
This was a legitimate complaint and one that proved Palin either looked the other way or wasn't looking at all as her husband tried to settle a personal score using state resources.
Second: Travel expenses.
Another one of the complaints came about after it was disclosed that the governor had charged the state the cost of airfare and incidentals for her family to travel with her on state business.
The complaint was eventually settled with the governor agreeing to reimburse the state over $9,000. The governor agreed that 10 of her children's state-paid trips went beyond where the line reasonably could be drawn.
At what point in time do you decide it's okay for taxpayers to pick up the tab for two of your kids to fly to Philadelphia and stay at the Ritz Carlton Hotel for five nights?
Had the governor thought it through, she wouldn't have billed the state for trips like that. The children's travel was a clear personal benefit with no benefit to the public paying the bill.
What's even more revealing is that early on in her term, the issue of the state not paying for her children's travel was apparently brought up by her staff but ignored by Palin.
If the governor is looking for a few reasons why she is facing legal fees; she just needs to look around her dinner table and then into the mirror.
NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed



