Matanuska Maid? Readers sound off...
NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed
I've been receiving a number of emails from readers who are asking for an update on the disposal of assets at Matanuska Maid.
Here are the latest reports I've received from email:
(Note: We reported this item prematurely six weeks ago but today the govenor's office has confirmed this is true.)
Additional comments by emailers:
Heard Ron Alleva is fighting tooth and nail over the auction business. He showed up with a 40 page bid the night of the meeting after hearing about the auction by chance. The meeting ran so long in executive session that Kristan C. asked to reconvene the next morning at 8:00. He drove back out, they went into executive session, knowing why he was there and that he had a presentation, they came out of executive session and they said they had awarded the bid to out of state companies and that was that! How do they get away with this????
One of the large tanks out of Mat Maid is sitting strapped to a flat bed trailer parked on the farm of Bob Havemeister. Did he pay for it? Was it leased? Why didn't Northern Lights Dairy have an opportunity to lease any of this stuff? This board does nothing but steer things to friends and family and absolutely no accountability.
Hope Lyda Green's audit gets to the bottom of why Tina Otto gave her resignation this week and also why the corporate attorney, Peter Ginder also resigned. No one finds this odd?
Just as in the continuing Mat Maid Debacle. First Sara's NEW carefully hand selected dairy board votes in nearly a 50% increase in milk checks for her neighbors. Then the blame game started as her new board lost record amounts of money. Then massive amounts of equipment were taken out of Mat Maid and delivered to the new dairy in Mat Valley. Former farmers are the new owners with no skin in the game. It is done just to bolster up 4 farmers. No help is being given to Norther Lights Diary who are innocent victims of this giveaway. Then the Chairwoman of the board hears Lyda Green wants to do an audit revolving around her new board activities and she quickly cuts a contract with Mikunda Cottrell BEFORE getting board approval for the audit and the $27,000 it costs. It was not an audit and only used to slander former management and boards. The latest on the auction bid being given to two California companies who would be unfamiliar with "the Alaska Factor." One firm just applied for their Alaska Business License and the other still does not have one. Protests were filed by local autioneers and denied by the Ass't. State's attorney General stating that Mat Maid was a private corporation and could do whatever they wanted. Two days after she wrote the letter dismissing their protests, she resigned her position after months of trying to keep this bunch inside the law. She knows the truth. If the private corporation status is true, why was a STATE board allowed to take TOTAL control of Mat Maid in June 2007? It was being run as a state agency without a doubt. Including accepting a $600,000 Appropriation from the STATE coffers. It was being run first by a new board memebr and then a Dept. of Commerce employee. Thatis not what happens within a private corporation. What connection does this board have with those two California auction companies? If there was originally an RFP put out last fall to sell both the Anchorage property and the Palmer property under State Procurement Law, why suddenly are they hiding behind the "private corp" status and NOT doing an RFP for local autioneers to dispose of what little equipment remains? This should have also been put out for bid. In the meantime, this same board voted in yet another $39,000 to pay for milk because this new dairy plant was not ready to accept local milk. This start up business has been fully funded by the Feds and the State of Alaska. To have that much equipment given to them on a next to nothing lease without anyone else having the opporunity to bid on them smells fishy. Awfully fishy. Everyone is related, old friends, daughter in laws, babysitters...all protecting each other. Meanwhile....the "farm has been given away" with minimal return to the state for the assets. And these are the same folks who will scream "BUY ALASKAN." Kindof Hypocritical, wouldn't you say? This State SEAL business smacks of the same kind of behind the doors kind of deal. What a waste of money. BTW,the new Matanuska Creamery does not have an Alaskan business license either. I guess they all are above the law.
Re Mat Maid The story noted:
"He drove back out, they went into executive session, knowing why he was there and that he had a presentation, they came out of executive session and they said they had awarded the bid to out of state companies and that was that! How do they get away with this????"
If in fact they came out and announced they had made a decision in executive session (and assuming the Mat Maid Board is not exempt from the Open Meetings Act (AS 44.62.....), they can't:
1. make a decision in executive session.
2. come out of executive session and essentially confirm a decision they had made already (I think there was a case in Anchorage- Brookwood Homeowners Association vs Municipality??) that went to the Alaska Supreme Court a number of years ago on that point.
Unfortunately, the solution is a lawsuit by an aggrieved party, or some publicity and questioning by someone like you (not that it appears anyone who claims to believe in open and transparent decision making is listening).
NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed



