Odds & Ends: Email requests
NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed
We reach into our email in box and pull out those that deserve a second look.
message: Regarding the Harbor Adjustment issue and "open govt" policy. The adjusting contract for the State is currently under dispute- the State is trying to renew Harbor Adjustment's contract for over $300,000 per year (1.5 million dollars) over the life of the contract, more than the next highest bidder. Harbor bid approx $1.5 million per year for the contract. the next highest was $1.2 million per year. Harbor won the bid; why?
Harbor Adjustments is the company at the center of the controversy surrounding former State Trooper Mike Wooten's injury claim. The company has a contract with the state to process workers compensation claims and has been reported to have been pressured by the governor's office to deny the claim back in the spring of 2007.
At first, company owner Murlene Wilkes told special investigator Steve Branchflower that no such pressure occured. Shortly thereafter, an employee of Harbor Adjustments called Branchflower and ended up giving a sworn deposition that the governor's office did pressure the firm to deny the claim.
message: I stumbled across another interesting tidbit. The FAA records are public domain, and easily searchable at landings.com as well as FAA sites.
Since Todd Palin has a float plane, it might seem appropriate that he get a license to fly the thing. If he has given rides to anyone outside of an instructor, he would be breaking federal law.
According to FAA records, he does not hold a seaplane rating.
An FAA records search shows Todd Palin does not have a seaplane rating:
https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/Detail.aspx?uniqid=A2535995&certNum=1
message: I've heard very little on the Mat Maid issue and think you should post something about the whole mess with Palin and her friends taking over the dairy to help her Wasilla neighbors who are dairy farmers.
This is from a recent web posting forwarded by a reader:
The Wall Street Journal recently covered a story I blogged about two weeks ago, yet another case of Palin deception, corruption and mismangement I whimsically called "Dairygate".
I was frankly intrigued, at first, that a prominent and staunchly conservative news periodical was willing to publish a story with the promising title "Creamery Case Has Palin Critics Taking Aim at Fiscal-Conservative Claim".
Reporter Jim Carlton does get one key fact right: after sacking the Dairy’s oversight board and vowing to "clean things up", Palin did indeed appointed "childhood friends" to the board, then closed Mat Maid after 6 months with more than $800,000 in additional losses.
Rather than vigorously and objectively pursue his leads, however, Carlton does his best to let principals directly involved in the story either explain away their own incompetence without a challenge, or hide their own central role in the most scandalous aspects of the story.
Two of Carlton’s main sources are Kristen Cole and Kyle Beus. Kristen Cole was the Palin crony appointed to chair the newly-reconstituted Board of Agriculture and Conservation and its sub-committee, the Dairy Board. Kyle Beus was a Palin constituent prominent in the local dairy industry who ended up opening a private processor, Matanuska Creamery, with a federal grant and much of the Matanuska Maid's pasteurizing and processing equipment.
While Carlton does identify Cole as a "grade-school friend" of Palin's, he leaves out a couple of deeply pertinent facts. He doesn't mention that Cole lacked any credentials for a high government post overseeing agriculture: she was a prominent local realtor, without any expertise in the dairy or any other farm-related industry. Carlton also fails to mention Cole's close personal ties to at least one dairy farmer, Robert Havemeister. Havemeister's daughter-in-law, Franci, had worked for Cole as a realtor. (Even more incredibly, Franci Havemeister was appointed Director of the Division of Agriculture by Palin, a position with direct oversight of the Mat Maid dissolution, despite being equally unqualified for her position and having an horrendous conflict of interest.)
Having close personal ties to the tiny industry they were supposed to be overseeing is in fact the only logical explanation for Cole's and Havemeister's appointments in the first place, as was discussed at the time by a prominent Palin critic and extensively commented upon by other locals. These two samples should give you an idea of the kind of disgust generated by Palin's actions.
Carlton doesn't just omit Cole's lack of qualfications or her incestuous connections with dairy industry insiders. Cole is given ample opportunity to defend her failed stint heading the Creamery Board. Carlton allows Cole to criticize the past regime for, among other things, failing "to rein in spending, for example, as milk prices were rising."
Carlton either did not know, or did not care to tell his readers, that Cole and the rest of the Palin-appointed Creamery Board actually raised the price Mat Maid paid for raw milk. . While a foolhardy act for a processor already losing money, the handful of local dairy farmers with whom Cole had ties immediately benefited by receiving more for their product. Instead of cutting costs and managing Mat Maid more efficiently, Cole and the board concentrated on helping their friends to more taxpayer dollars.
Carlton also fails to mention that a $600,000 state grant that the prior Board had refused was accepted by Cole and the other board members, and then was used to buy milk and defray operating expenses, hardly a decision that a team of budget hawks would be likely to make if they lacked personal ties to the recipients of the grant money.
In her own defense, Cole points out that keeping Mat Maid on life support until December "allowed the farmers to find new buyers, including a private creamery that recently opened near Wasilla with a federal grant." While not identified by name, the only entity matching this description is Kyle Beus' Matanuska Creamery. Carlton, moreover, describes Beus as simply "a former local dairy farmer". This allows a key player and primary beneficiary of the Mat Maid closing to posture as if he were not longer involved in the dairy business in Alaska (a "former" dairy farmer), and were simply an old hand looking on objectively from the sidelines and cheering Palin on, a major distortion of the facts to say the least. For example, Beus is quoted praising Palin for having the "leadership" to step in and give the farmers time to find new places to sell their products. Beus fails to mention that Palin’s "leadership" greatly benefited him personally, giving him time to buy state assets in a private fire sale, and obtain a federal grant to set up a private operation.
NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed



