Time To Go Tom!

BECOME A FAN OF FIRE TOM IRWIN ON FACEBOOK

fblogo

 

Standing up for Alaska: One governor, two faces

NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed

One of these days Governor Sarah Palin will realize that the folks back home can actually hear what she says on the road while representing Alaska. One day she will; but it certainly wasn't yesterday.

According to June Kronholz who writes for the Washington Wire, a Wall Street Journal blog covering politics, at Monday's National Governor's Association meeting, Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell was addressing the group as the incoming head of the organization. 

Rendell stated that his priority for his coming term would be to push for a larger investment in public infrastructure from congress. He decried the nations $1.6 trillion infrastructure deficit. However Rendell said that there would be difficulties convincing voters of the need for such investments.

Kronholz writes, "A problem for big plans like that, he added, is that such basic-needs spending is out of favor with voters. And the reason for that? “The Bridge to Nowhere,” he said, citing a pet project championed by Alaska’s Sen. Ted Stevens and Rep. Don Young that was derailed following an outburst of public anger over the cost. Infrastructure “has become just a pork-barrel process in voters’ eyes,” he said."

Kronholz then wrote, "Alaska’s Gov. Sarah Palin—like Stevens, a Republican—rushed over to Rendell afterwards to remind him that she had vetoed construction of the bridge."

Let's pause and listen to that again: "Alaska's Gov. Sarah Palin rushed over to Rendell afterwards to remind him that she had vetoed construction of the bridge." 

According to the Ketchikan Daily News edition on August 8, 2006, this is what Sarah Palin rushed over to tell the voters of Ketchikan during the primary election campaign:

'People across the nation struggle with the idea of building a bridge because they’ve been under these misperceptions about the bridge and the purpose,' said Palin, who described the link as the Ketchikan area’s potential for expansion and growth.

Palin said Alaska’s congressional delegation worked hard to obtain funding for the bridge as part of a package deal and that she 'would not stand in the way of the progress toward that bridge.'”

And according to the Ketchikan Daily News on September 29, 2006 this is what Sarah Palin rushed over to tell the voters of Ketchikan during the general election campaign:

'Part of my agenda is making sure that Southeast is heard. That your projects are important. That we go to bat for Southeast when we’re up against federal influences that aren’t in the best interest of Southeast.'

She cited the widespread negative attention focused on the Gravina Island crossing project. 'We need to come to the defense of Southeast Alaska when proposals are on the table like the bridge and not allow the spinmeisters to turn this project or any other into something that’s so negative,' Palin said.

But yet Palin, rushed over to placate  Rendell who just got finished doing exactly what she said she'd defend Alaskans against. 

It shouldn't surprise anyone.

Governor Sarah Palin, a CEO who couldn't bother to rush over to meet with head of the Mat Maid Dairy when things went sour,  instead choosing to wave signs with angry farmers in front of television cameras.

Governor Sarah Palin, a CEO who couldn't bother to rush over to tell her Commissioner of Public Safety that she was replacing him, instead sending an acting staffer to do her dirty work.

Governor Sarah Palin, a CEO who couldn't bother to rush over to tell Ketchikan community leaders as well as the congressional delegation she planned to veto the funding for the Ketchikan bridge, instead sending out a 5:30am press release so it would hit the east coast news cycle.

But yet she rushed over to tell the Governor of Pennsylvania that she wasn't to blame for the negative publicity surrounding the same bridge she promised to fight for during her campaign.

One governor, two faces. What a bargain.

To read the Washington Wire:

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/07/14/who-says-highways-arent-sexy/


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Ketchikan's Bridge

Gov. Palin didn't veto this bridge. The money was left in the appropriation by Congress, but the purpose was removed. So Gov. Palin took advantage of the opportunity to 'steal' the money and spend in on other 'needs' around Wasilla and Anchorage. But she did't veto the money - she used it on her own priorities.


Palin vetoed the bridge, then had to reverse field

She did say the bridge project was over and would no longer be pursued. Then when the federal funding agency said such a decision would require repayment of the millions spent to date on getting through the environmental and design work, she was brought up short and had to change direction. Why? cause federal law says the state is liable for these costs if the project is not completed and the feds were forced to play this card, given her public announcement. But, she was given a soft landing option by the feds. If, the project were reopened, and a different alternative selected (the much cheaper ferry alternative) and approved, the state could avoid the heavy repayment. The new environmental effort is underway at this time, at cost of $2 million. Since repayment could cost $20 million or higher, this must seem the best bargain. So was this a veto, or was it a retreat?


The Palin Two Faces?

Nothing New Here! Let's just move on to the next un-challange exec. ethical violation, not reported backroom deals, absolutely ridiculous thought, word and actions, to be continued.....


You folks are missing the point

First of all, thank you for your kind posting regarding my hosting,(wow,it rhymes), of the Dan Fagan show last week. I would remind you, that you, Dan, Rick, the Voice of the Times,Mike Pocaro and some select lawmakers are the only ones speaking out for those of us who still see the iceberg looming ahead. Having said that, I'm surprised that no one has noticed the good Gov. doing her best Harvey Dent impersonation. The new Batman opens this month, and she's just got bat fever. Dent, is the character that becomes the villain Two-Face, and flips a coin to determine all major decisions. However, with this governor, we never win the coin flip. Heads, she wins, tails we lose. Instead of pointing out that Alaska has only been a state for 50 years, and is behind the power curve in infrastructure, she chooses to flip a coin and cling to the unfair puplic perception that our state takes money and wastes it on bridges to nowhere. Thanks Sarah. Thanks for thinking ahead, and using the bully pulpit to set the record straight. Good on Ya...


A FLIPPIN' AND A FLOPPIN"...THAT'S MY GOV!

People----are you absorbing what Andrew writes about every day? This Governor is as phony as they come. Does she think no one will notice that she is constantly covering her a$$. It's all about being popular at the moment-no matter where she is. Her day of reckoning is coming. No one thinks this game of charades can last much longer. She cares not a moment about all the people she has thrown under the bus...and for what?......Pure vindictiveness. Tired of her "holier than thou" game. Stand up legislators........Are you all Afraid of getting an "OFF WITH YOUR HEAD" if you don't obey the Queen? It's "easier" to go along...it takes guts and conviction to stand up for what is right. Just do it! You'll sleep better at night......trust me....


Two faces, one spiteful, the other vengeful

Something sinister is going on right under our noses. The AGIA fiasco is being used as cover. The governor is moving the capitol to Anchorage, at least her “executive support group”, the one that tries to mend the damage whenever she blurts out another ill-conceived, vote-pandering idea. I don't remember voting to move the capitol out of Juneau, but obviously it is being moved to Anchorage (and Wasilla). Why else would the governor be pushing most of the Commerce, Community and Economic Development's staff off the 17th floor in Anchorage to make room for her new Chief of Staff and other “executive staff” (I use that term lightly, as there is no executive in the house)? Tony Knowles did the same thing. Our last governor tried to stop this outflow and was roundly criticized. Now our new governor thinks it would be a “Simpler Life”, if she could just work from home. Did she tell the unsuspecting citizens of Juneau that she would also cover the losses on their homes when the State moves out entirely? First it was Ketchikan’s Gravina Bridge, now part of the lifeblood of Juneau is being cut out - watch out Southeast, this governor is out to cut your throat, just like she did to a co-worker when he turned down her request to work from home while serving as a Commissioner of the AOGCC. Or is the real culprit our “First Dude”, Todd Palin. I don’t remember voting for him to be making any major decisions from the 17th floor in “their” new capitol office.


Oh yes, what a bargain! Maybe as in bargain basement?

Can people connect the dots? Can't they see this is just an example of the two faces that are constantly at play? Reminds me of those signs that twirl in the wind giving two different ads.


Miss Quoted?

Perhaps she actually said: "Part of my agenda is making sure that Southeast is hurt. That I make your voters impotent. That we throw the Southeast under the train when we’re up against federal influences that aren’t in the best interest of my political future.." The promise was kind-of-open and translucent NOT consistent or honest. But she’s so cute…………. Wake up Alaska!!!


NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed


copyright 2007 Andrew Halcro, All Rights Reserved.