Media

COMING SEPTEMBER 2

The Program w/ Andrew Halcro
M - F, 1pm to 3pm
KENI 650am Radio

Listen to a podcast of the show:
http://www.650keni.com/

New Radio Clip:

Halcro/Palin Argument on the Eddie Burke Show (MP3 Format, 3 MB)

 

The business of government

So you want government to run like a business? If that’s your desire we’ll have to manage the inherent challenges in our operations department.

In business, customers always want a consistent product. In order to stay profitable you have to find innovative ways to provide it faster, friendlier and with more value. It’s called the free market.

In government, customers rarely want a consistent product. Some customers might support a certain initiative and yet even more customers may oppose that very same idea. The goal is to please just enough customers to get re-elected, it’s called representative democracy.

In business, decisions are made quickly with no public input. In government, decisions are made slowly with public process being the road to resolution.

In business, hiring management is based on extensive searches and interviews. In government, hiring management is based on whoever survives the primary. And sometimes the final decision is an exercise of choosing the lesser of two evils.

That leads us to the one challenge that will always determine the success or failure of any business or government, the quality of the management. So how does our company’s management compare? Lets compare a well-known business against our company, the Alaska State Legislature, in order to see how our management differs during difficult financial times.

Alaska Airlines has long been recognized as one of the premier airlines in the country. But even with exceptional service and a lion’s share of the Alaska travel market, the carrier has not been able to avoid rising operating costs, lower yields and over capacity that has plagued the entire airline industry.

In an effort to reduce expenses, the company’s top executives recently announced they would be taking voluntary salary cuts while trying to negotiate labor savings to keep the carrier in profitable skies.

In June, Chief Executive William J. Ayers informed employees that he and other Alaska Air Group senior managers were cutting their annual salaries anywhere from 15 to 20%. This comes at a time when seven larger competitors, many in bankruptcy, have achieved savings through similar measures. This is truly leading by example.

The Alaska State Legislature has been dealing with similar financial woes, but for much longer. Over the last ten years they’ve been losing money almost every year, only being able to pay the bills by accessing reserve funds. Unfortunately, they’re on the verge of spending up the remaining balance in the reserve account and there is no solution on the horizon.

So what has our management done to reduce expenses? Their response was to take services away from customers who need them most, children and seniors.

In May, our majority management passed legislation that takes health care coverage away from over 100 pregnant women and 1,200 children. This was passed and signed by the governor despite the testimony of health care experts who warned that the elimination of preventive care would end up costing the state much more than the projected savings.

Last week, it was announced that there wasn’t enough votes among majority management for addressing the veto of the longevity bonus for Alaskan seniors. To add insult to economic injury, they didn’t even have the courage to make it known to their constituents how each manager voted.

So how about our management’s commitment to sharing the financial pain? No voluntary salary reductions here.

In fact, according to the Legislative Affairs Agency, managers who supported eliminating programs for children and seniors claimed an average of over $76,000 last year in compensation. And that doesn’t even include the free health care coverage and generous retirement benefits they enjoyed.

That’s sizable compensation for citizen legislators working a part time job.

And if that’s not enough, they increased their donation limits so each manager could receive more money from lobbyist and big donors to keep their jobs. So much for leadership by example.

The moral of the story is that if we want government to run like a business, we need to start hiring managers who actually know how a successful business runs. Otherwise, Alaskans will keep seeing nothing but pure funny business.

Next time we’ll chat about our marketing department.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The business of goverment

Andrew, This is my first time reading your blog and I couldn't agree with you more that our local goverment needs more managers who know how to run a successful business. Also I wanted to pass along a congratulations on your Saturday afternoon radio spot, you do an outstanding job! You really do your homework...keep up the good work! Rocky


Government Like a Business

Mr. Halcro, I am split on your ideas about running the government like a business. On one side, I'd love to see accountability in the system as there is next to none at this point (when did state politics stop being public information?). Accountability would bring to light all of the abuses and misuses of power in the system including the mercantilist ideals of the GOP and the pet social projects of the minority. Once brought into plain view, the public could then make educated decisions in the voting booth. I am 100% behind this idea. Unfortunately, even though running the governement as a business would inevitably make it much more efficient, it would ultimately enable it to grow. I fear we would accelerate an already Quasi-Socialist state. Higher efficiency means laws are passed faster, more social program are created and before you know it we at the same point we are now, governement bursting at the seams and the budget tapped out (even though we would be getting more for our dollar). I guess my point is that I'd like to see the efficiency you propose coupled with a hiring freeze, or a elimination of non-essential services. That would put the state back in the black and ultimately relieve some tax burden on business'/people. Thanks for your time! Daniel Rauchenstein Anchorage


give me a break

Well Andy, not every legislator is independently wealthy like yourself. To some it is their only job to support their family. So, hey lets quit whining about legislative pay. Sounds like the same old sour grapes you threw around when you were fiddling around in Juneau with your HOBBY, politics. Do you want to try and support three kids and a home on the legislative base pay (around 30,000 I think)? Catch a clue. If all you want is the wealthy legislating then why not make it completely voluntary. Then you and your Harvard buddies can "play politics" all you want. We want real people who work hard and deserve any pay they get.

 

Andrew's Response:

In the future, please include your name and email so I can respond properly.

In short, the Alaska Legislature was created as a citizen legislature, not a full time job. This has nothing to do with wealth and everything to do with career politicians who have managed government poorly, while living off of government.

In addition, I'd point out the fact that my industry is one of the very few in Alaska that actually pays state taxes.

As you've written, "To some it is their only job to support their family", which means the legislature has become a dumping ground for those whose primary objective is to get re-elected in order to keep their state employment.

Meanwhile there are those of us Alaskans who go to work everyday, personally invest in growing their business while paying taxes and fees to pay for those who choose to live off government.

You're exactly right...give me a break.

 

 

 

 

 


Question

Since the Alaska Legislature is a part time position and meets 90 days out of the year, is the Governor position also part time? All I could find was the following: "The governor has a duty to enforce state laws, and the power to either approve or veto bills passed by the Alaska Legislature,[A] to convene the legislature, and to grant pardons, except in cases of impeachment" I had read that Sarah Palin stayed in Wasilla when she was elected Governor because the Legislature was not in session. This is what prompted my question. If you can clarify this will you please send it to my email. Thank you!


Silly argument

The belief that government service at all levels should be done "gratis" or nearly so is completely infantile. If we practiced what you preached, we would never get ANYONE to be a senator, or even a congressman. Not a single person worth their salt would enter politics, unless of course they could "pay" themselves through lining their pockets. Your logic is so completely backwards it is laughable. Once you get past a small city government, you MUST pay for quality people. If you want Alaska to be a podunk state, then your plan will work wonders. You are not living in the real world. Oh, and your section, "Andrew's Views" don't say a damn thing. I just wasted 15 minutes I will never get back. Thanks.


Well some folks aren't

Well some folks aren't motivated by the almighty dollar, sir. Some actually strive to be public servants and make sacrifices to serve their fellow alaskans. Maybe you were too busy finding gremlins during your house tenure that you didn't get to know the backgrounds of your collegues. Sure there are always Ogans and such, but that is society. Some good, some bad, some indifferent. Your last paragraph really makes me feel a bit insulted. State and municipal workers go to work everyday, invest in their state or municipality while they, as you put it, "live off the government" as though they were some parasite. I am sure my father, a 30 year marine highway employee, lifetime resident and state pioneer and my mother a 30 year teacher and state pioneer will be quite interested in your perception of their value as opposed to the pious private sector. I do respect the fact that you posted my comments, but that is about it. One break.......coming up!

Andrew's response:

My Mother in-law spent over two decades working for the State of Alaska, so please don't take my comments out of context and use them to make a self serving point.

There is a distinct difference between dedicated public employees like your parents or my Mother in-law and politicians that get  elected by complaining about government and then living off all it provides.

You previously claimed that some serve as legislators because it's the only job they can get. Imagine what that would do to government accountability if we used that excuse for every other government responsibility. 

And for the record, I didn't have to search for gremlins in Juneau. Usually they were walking around the halls of the capitol in full view.

 

 

 

 


copyright 2007 Andrew Halcro, All Rights Reserved.