Media

COMING SEPTEMBER 2

The Program w/ Andrew Halcro
M - F, 1pm to 3pm
KENI 650am Radio

Listen to a podcast of the show:
http://www.650keni.com/

New Radio Clip:

Halcro/Palin Argument on the Eddie Burke Show (MP3 Format, 3 MB)

 

Why AGIA won't deliver Alaskans a gas pipeline

Tuesday during the debate over AGIA, a number of lawmakers stated they were voting for AGIA because they believed at the end of the day TransCanada and the producers would come together.

The attached letter explains why that will never happen and makes our point that AGIA does little more than put the natural gas pipeline project at risk for delays and exposes taxpayers to possible treble damages.

See this Article in Print!
Download Article (PDF)

1.62 MB

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

TransCanada Pipe Co/Denali Pipe Co

TC as years of documented successful experience building and operating pipelines. The brand new Denali pipe Co., (progeny of the producers), by law, has to be an entirely separate and distinct corp. Has Denali ever done anything? Where's their documented track record? They can't even answer the phone or respond to Alaskans seeking work--all those Alaskans touted in their testimony and adverts. Trying to communicate with them is an exercise in frustration: voice jail and dead end web pages. Denali has never built an inch of pipe, conducted an open season or negotiated with customers. They are incorporated specifically to prevent recourse through them to the BP & CP balance sheets. They do play a crafty game though encouraging and letting our misconceptions stand uncorrected about a "producer built pipe." Look at the performance of Mr. Fackrell before the the legislature for a sneak peak of how the neophyte Denali corporation will deal with our state. Bewildered unresponsive cluelessness and pointing us elswhere for action and answers will leave our state as frustrated (and broke) as those Alaskans looking to Denali for a job interview.


Video clip

of Hal Kvisle president of TransCanada disappeared... Please put that back up.


Advice for Halcro

Instead of spending all of your time and energy fighting, why don't you do something constructive? Why do you spend all of your time posting on blogs as different identities? It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.

I have no idea what you are talking about. I always post under my own name....I have no need to hide my identify. AH


Andrew, keep up the exceptional work and courage.

I appreciate the time you have taken to expose this inept group of immature politicos. Turning off black berry service as a first clue one is no longer employed by the Administration, how professional! You stood up for yourself in the Legislature and now your standing for the little guy who doesn't know how to get information. I can't go on except to say, get the emails, and keep your personal integrity intact. You have recognized this situation for exactly what it is, the greatest act Alaska has ever seen.


Please give credit to the author you just butchered!

Really, to take a pretty well known poem and butcher it to try to say Andrew is in the wrong is quite a stretch. Have you stooped so low because there really isn't anything to say when you get your hand caught in the cookie jar?


If you were educated

... then you would know that it's not a poem, its a portion of a speech delivered by Theodore Roosevelt in Paris, France on April 23, 1910. It's a direct quote from the full text of the speech, not butchered in any way. Further, it is indeed quite appropriate to attribute this quote to Andrew Halcro.

..I much rather be associated with a quote from a speech delivered by Homer Simpson in Springfield, "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!"  A.H.


Facts Are Meaningless

Have you learned about the Flying Spaghetti Monster? His followers have proven that global warming is directly related to the decline of pirates in the world. It is an amazing thing. The correlation is self evident. We need more pirates to save the world. Look it up on wikipedia.


Are you admitting to plagiarism?

The "unauthorized use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own..."? If you were educated you would have known not to do that. Of course if you are Sarah, you'll just lay blame on someone else.


Someone Got Into the Cooking Sherry

Andrew, The Palin melt down has these Palinbots hitting the sauce and I suspect this guy got into the Cooking Sherry a little early today. If anyone can figure out what this guy is talking about other than the typical "I've got my blinders on, I'm holding my nose and I think Sara and Todd are just great" please let the rest of us know.


TC's initial proposal

Andrew, Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't it say in TC's initial proposal application that the only way they could build the line in addition to the 500 MILLION from AK was to then go to the federal govt. (U.S. not canada's) and ask them to underwrite the project? Wasn't that a stipulation for actually building the line? And, why is it that this particular point has been lost in all this...So here we are today, We're going to pay 500 MILLION DOLLARS to a canadian corporation for a lobbying and paper filing fee to go lobby our federal government (I guess because our current administration is too inept to carry on that task themselves) for additional money so that this same company can increase their bottom line to their shareholders....and we're not even their top priority- Alaska is 4th on their "to-do" list. Nice job if you can get it!

Andrew's Response:

Jack,

Very timely question.

From today’s Calgary Herald:

 

 

Palmer said TransCanada will continue to request bridge-shipper backing from Washington to let the project push forward without commitments from the big three producers.

 

"It's more likely we would be discussing it with the next administration and the next Congress . . . to see if they have any interest in those concepts."

 

 


BP letter

The author made some great points. How can our state offer a foreign company with ZERO Alaska experience,ZERO Alaska capital investment,ZERO Alaska project experience, ZERO Permafrost experience(in Alaska or Canada) $500 million when qualified companies will do it for free and have the market capitalization and proven experience to get it done? The oil companies have paid over $77 billion in taxes after all and another $10 billion this year. And oh by the way, TransCanada might be billions in the whole before getting started.


Come On Now

Since when are Exxon, BP, or ConocoPhillips local companies? Trans-national corporations is more like it. I believe the producers are in to stay and are essential to the successful implementation of a gas line. Can't we keep the rhetoric topical and honest? The only proposal I have heard that has a US interest completely at the helm is Governor Hickel's All Alaska gas line built by the State of Alaska.


TC Alaska Qualifications

Could you imagine the squealing in this state if an oil company gave a foreign company the right to build a major project. Further they paid them to participate and they had no employees in the state now, or forever. Had never worked in the Alaskan arctic or permafrost any where. Get real these guys are not technically qualified to do a project 10% this big.


Technicality

"... imaging the squealing in this state if an oil company gave a foreign company the right ot build a major project"? The state does this all the time -- if you recall -- BP -- BP stands for British Petroleum -- that's a foreign company -- building a major project in Alaska.


Technicality

BP legally goes by "BP". It is no longer British Petroleum as our dear friend attorney Les Gara likes to refer to it as.


You Mean Trial Lawyer Gara

He isn't an attorney. He is an ambulance chaser in legislative clothing. The ambulances he chases happen to be hydrocarbon development corporations.


Technically

BP- Beyond Petroleum Beyond petroleum is about... reaching past one company to combine the talents of many delivering performance without trade-offs the courage to lead, not just the ability to compete innovating, improving, making a difference being creatively engaged and applying the skills that we have to provide answers, not excuses


BP Employee

Does that mean you work for BP?


Missing the point

The problem is not whether TC can technically execute a pipeline. it is pretty clear they can and your anti-Canadian animus blinds you to this fact. The problem is AGIA, and this unfinished multi-billion dollar liability that TC has not cleared up from its first attempt to build here. The BP letter points this out.


copyright 2007 Andrew Halcro, All Rights Reserved.