The state of Tom Van Flein's state contract?

This has gone way beyond the Keystone Kops stage. You would think there is a gaggle of teenagers running the state. The Palin crowd is acting as if there are no consequences for their actions, no lie is too outlandish, any excuse will do, the Palinbots will believe anything.

So where is Talis Colberg? When is he coming back? Who is left in charge? What's up with his sudden departure? Was it politically motivated?

If the "State of Alaska" is Van Flein's client he would need to consult with the State and obtain its consent before representing Sarah and Todd as private clients. That appears to be the requirement of the Alaska Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.11 and others. You should check with the Alaska Bar Association on its interpretation of this Rule as applies to these facts.

Is Van Flein getting paid by the State to represent Todd Palin?

Is the Anti-Christ male, female, a political party?

The Palins and their representatives from the McCain campaign have told one lie after another, so it is not surprising that there is yet another one. First Colberg has a conflict, then he doesn't. Forst Palin is going to cooperate, then she isn't. First the people of Alaska run their own state; then the Palins turn it over to the McCain campaign.

Have you seen the informal Attorney General opinion, 1994 Alaska Op Atty Gen (inf) 223, 1994 WL 869572. Says the state can not pay for defense of an ethics act complaint. So the state can't pay Van Flein to argue that the complaint sarah filed against herself should be dismissed. 1994 Alaska Op. Atty. Gen. (Inf.) 223, 1994 WL 869572 (Alaska A.G.) Office of the Attorney General State of Alaska File No. 663-94-0289 June 3, 1994 Indemnification and defense of board members in Ethics Act investigations John Klepper Chair, Board of Marine Pilots Your predecessor, Bob Watt, requested an opinion on whether the State would defend and indemnify a board member who is the subject of an Ethics Act complaint arising from the good faith performance of the member's official duties. We informed Mr. Watt that the State could not provide a defense or indemnification to board members in Ethics Act investigations. This memorandum confirms that advice. The Executive Branch Ethics Act, AS 39.52, applies to both state employees and members of boards and commissions. AS 39.52.960(21). The Ethics Act, in broad effect, prohibits a public officer from using an official position for personal gain. See, e.g., AS 39.52.120. Ethics Act complaints against current or former public officers may be filed by any person with the attorney general. AS 39.52.310(b). If a complaint is in the proper form and alleges facts which, if true, would constitute a violation of the Act, the attorney general will investigate the complaint. AS 39.52.310(d). If the attorney general determines that there is probable cause to believe that the subject of the complaint committed a knowing violation of the Act that cannot be corrected, the attorney general shall initiate formal proceedings against the subject of the complaint. AS 39.52.350. If the subject admits to violations or, after a hearing, the personnel board determines that violations have occurred, the personnel board may impose penalties. AS 39.52.350(d); 39.52.410; 39.52.440; 39.52.450. The potential penalties for a nonsalaried board or commission member include fines of up to $5,000 for each violation, removal from the board or commission, restitution, and repayment of twice the benefit realized from the violation. Actions taken by the board or commission in violation of the Ethics Act may be declared void. A public officer who is accused of an Ethics Act violation will not necessarily have to defend him or herself in a hearing before the personnel board. The attorney general may dismiss the complaint, may refer the matter to the officer's designated ethics supervisor for resolution, or may recommend corrective or preventive action. AS 39.52.310; 39.52.320; 39.52.330. A public officer may seek private legal counsel at any time during an Ethics Act investigation. No section of the Ethics Act, however, provides for indemnification or defense of public officers, whether public employees or members of boards or commissions. Although the State will defend and indemnify a board or commission member when the member is sued for damages arising out of the good faith performance of a duty or official function, see, e.g., AS 08.02.020; Memorandum from Assistant Attorney General Gary Amendola to Board of Marine Pilots (Sept. 19, 1990), a complaint under the Ethics Act is not a suit for damages. See Black's Law Dictionary at 389 (6th ed. 1990) (defining “damages” as “[m]oney compensation sought or awarded as a remedy for a breach of contract or tort.”). *2 In sum, an expense incurred in defense of an Ethics Act complaint, or any penalty levied as a result of that complaint, is the responsibility of the public officer who was the subject of the complaint. The State will not provide a defense or indemnification for actions under the Executive Branch Ethics Act. Stephen C. Slotnick Assistant Attorney General 1994 Alaska Op. Atty. Gen. (Inf.) 223, 1994 WL 869572 (Alaska A.G.) END OF DOCUMENT

Is there a Palin type head of government plus operatives like Colbergh supported by skitzos like Van Flien in every city, in every state in the union across the Nation? OR has someone like J.EdgarH come back from the dead as Palin to claim this State as their own domain and simply cast an evil spell that ordinary Alaskans are susceptible to; including especially our State law makers and our state employees? Palin....and those around her getting away with this type of conduct over and over and over like this for years can not be explained away as a phenomenon. And the wickedness The Palin's have given birth to and the vo-doo the Palin Cult People [PCP] are so skilled at and getting away with has moved into the realm of...BEYOND SCARY. The PCP can not be excused rationally by saying this is "politics as usual". OFFICIALLY Whatever is going on I feel like I personally need to take my family and go underground. I am afraid we may get infected by watching, reading or listening to what ever is coming next from the PCP's. Clearly though; reading your Blogs and responses there are others like me who are not under the spell or influence of the PCP's; yet. But the power of the PCP is undeniable. And unexplainable. Is there a non-partisan effort being organized to take back our State I need to know of?