Troopergate: The final words?
NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed
There appears to be a lot wrong with the report conducted by Personnel Board Investigator Tim Petumenos when compared to the Branchflower report and many questions remain unanswered.
* Conflicts in evidence that he missed or disregarded
* Misapprehension of the law
* Witnesses he never spoke with directly and whose credibility he could not have assessed
* Evidence he ignored
* An acceptance of statements by the Governor uncritically
* An unsupportable application of the legal standard of "probable cause"
* The failure to consider the evidence in the aggregate
* The failure to even acknowledge, let along evaluate, the circumstantial evidence (e.g., eight individuals all doing and saying the same thing, oftentimes in exactly the same words, 35 times over 18 months, permits a reasonable inference of direction and coordination)
Here's just one example:
Compare the last paragraph on page 31 of the report:
"Governor Palin, in any event, has testified under oath that she was unaware that Todd Palin made these early 2007 inquires to Commissioner Monegan. Todd Palin confirmed that he did not discuss either the Monegan meeting or Commissioner Monegan's follow up call with the Governor at any time until the matter became the subject of scrutiny in 2008."
. . . with the last paragraph on the February 7, 2007 e-mail from the Governor to Walt Monegan in Exhibit 2 of the Report [Tab 2]:
"Just my opinion - I know you know I've experienced a lot of frustration with this issue. I know Todd's even expressed to you a lot of concern about our family's safety after this trooper threatened to kill a family member - ..."
* This e-mail was after the Governor's phone conversation with Monegan (which she apparently denies occurred)
* But the email obviously acknowledges the prior email; otherwise, what would her statement, "I know you know I've experienced a lot of frustration with this issue," be based on? How would Monegan have known of her frustration if the conversation never occurred?
* How did the Governor know that Todd had expressed their concern to Monegan if she was unaware that Todd had made inquiries to Monegan?
* Why doesn't the Report address the obvious conflict between the Palin's deposition testimony and the dated and signed emails? Why doesn't the conflict create, at a minimum, probable cause?
In addition, Petumenos ruled that Todd Palin is simply an average private citizen and Governor Palin had no authority to try and stop him from pressuring senior level staffers from stalking the Wooten matter.
If Petumenos' argument is correct and Todd Palin is simply an average private citizen, why then is he allowed unfettered access to the governor's senior staff and why is he allowed to receive an read confidential emails that other average private citizens are denied?
More questions indeed.
http://www.adn.com/troopergate/story/582690.html
http://www.adn.com/opinion/view/story/581487.html
NEW! Subscribe to RSS Feed



